OFPP Chief says that Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) are not a problem and that they solve strategic requirements for a narrow range of products and services.
Earlier this week, we discussed GWACs and interagency contracts. Now, NASA gets a shot to keep theirs.
Do you think GWACs and other interagency contracts are needed/desired? Do you think they serve a purpose?
How about intra-agency contracts (such as Army contracts used by the Navy, etc.). Do they have the same issues as interagency and GWACs?
Showing posts with label GWACs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GWACs. Show all posts
Thursday, December 21, 2006
Monday, December 18, 2006
Hundreds of interagency contracts available for use
According to the results of a recent survey, there are over 250 interagency contracts. In case you didn't know, using interagency contracts is "not well understood."
While the chief of OFPP thinks 12 Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) is not too many, but his deputy doesn't think so.
If someone comes up with a good contracting solution, why should we re-invent the wheel? Just need to get the details sorted out so we have better contract administration.
While the chief of OFPP thinks 12 Government Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs) is not too many, but his deputy doesn't think so.
If someone comes up with a good contracting solution, why should we re-invent the wheel? Just need to get the details sorted out so we have better contract administration.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
